The Ford Barn

The Ford Barn (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/index.php)
-   Model A (1928-31) (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   3:27 or 3:54 ?? (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=162294)

Neil Mylar LakewoodCA 02-24-2015 04:21 PM

3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

I am buying a 1928 Tudor Sedan, soon.

I plan on putting a high compression police head on it (B on the head).

I have the option of adding either a 3:27 R&P or a 3:54 R&P.

In an earlier thread I asked if the police head would be enough to propell the 3:27 R&P in a light weight pickup truck. The concenses seemed to be yes.

As you know a Tudor is a heavier body. Would it be better to use a 3:54 in the Tudor or would the police head be enough to propell the 3:27?

Also, most parts houses sell a speedometer gear for the 3:54. No one seems to have the correct speedometer gear for the 3:27. As a default, some recommend the same speedometer gear as for the 3:54, which probably means that the speedometer would be off a little. Can anyone comfirm this?

Thank you,
Neil

Tom Wesenberg 02-24-2015 04:49 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

Bert's has the correct speedometer adaptor for the 3.27 ring and pinion, and that's the gears I'd like to put in my 29 Tudor.

Synchro909 02-24-2015 05:00 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

I am seriously considering putting a set of 16" wheels on my A with 195 - 80 tyres. That means they will be smaller than the originals but to compensate, I'm also considering changing to a 3.54 diff. Any comments/recommendations?

modelAtony 02-24-2015 05:02 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil Mylar LakewoodCA (Post 1039696)
I am buying a 1928 Tudor Sedan, soon.

I plan on putting a high compression police head on it (B on the head).

I have the option of adding either a 3:27 R&P or a 3:54 R&P.

In an earlier thread I asked if the police head would be enough to propell the 3:27 R&P in a light weight pickup truck. The concenses seemed to be yes.

As you know a Tudor is a heavier body. Would it be better to use a 3:54 in the Tudor or would the police head be enough to propell the 3:27?

Also, most parts houses sell a speedometer gear for the 3:54. No one seems to have the correct speedometer gear for the 3:27. As a default, some recommend the same speedometer gear as for the 3:54, which probably means that the speedometer would be off a little. Can anyone comfirm this?

Thank you,
Neil

Neil, I have 31 tudor and have been running 3:27 gear since 2001. This was when my car had orig head and only modification was electronic ign. and alternator. I was running this gear when everyone was saying it was to high of a gear. I was still able to pull off from a stop sign in 2 nd gear. This was the first major change I did and I'm glad I did. check on my avatar and see the other changes I made. You will only get 7 mph more speed and not the 10 mph they all advertise. The new speedometer gear you will need is the 17 tooth gear. Have fun modelAtony tony white Lafayette, LA

BRENT in 10-uh-C 02-24-2015 05:03 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

Based on my experiences installing several 3.27 ratios, it is not the head that makes or breaks the deal. It is the cam. I have installed one 3.27 ratio with a stock head (milled only to true it up) and an IB330 cam and it did fine in a '30 Coupe albeit not as agile as one with better breathing and more compression. I have also installed a 3.27 in a '29 Roadster that had a rebuilt engine with a Brumfield head and a 'touring' cam. It was a 'slug' IMHO.

Those two cars and their drive train were not totally comparing apples-to-apples, but it has allowed me to form an opinion that camshafts create better driveabilty than what a hi-compression head does. Note I did not say more horsepower, just better driveability.

qmdv 02-24-2015 05:15 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

I had a 3.27 in a 29 roadster pickup with 750x16 tires. Engine was a B motor, C crank, Cook 4 port head and two Winfield carbs. Ran great. Could still kick but on a Porsche 914 that I encountered on way home from work. He hated me.

Tim

BRENT in 10-uh-C 02-24-2015 05:18 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by modelAtony (Post 1039724)
Neil, I have 31 tudor and have been running 3:27 gear since 2001. This was when my car had orig head and only modification was electronic ign. and alternator. I was running this gear when everyone was saying it was to high of a gear. I was still able to pull off from a stop sign in 2 nd gear. This was the first major change I did and I'm glad I did. check on my avatar and see the other changes I made. You will only get 7 mph more speed and not the 10 mph they all advertise. The new speedometer gear you will need is the 17 tooth gear. Have fun modelAtony tony white Lafayette, LA

Yes, the speed difference is only about 16%, ....which equates out to 60 MPH with the 3.27 when previously driving 52 MPH.

ModelAMike1930 02-24-2015 06:27 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

I have 16's on my pickup, but never go fast enough to make any difference on the speedometer--lol

Patrick L. 02-24-2015 07:00 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

I would think terrain comes into play here.

modelAsteve 02-24-2015 07:15 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

Brent- What is an IB330 cam?

Mitch//pa 02-24-2015 07:21 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by modelAsteve (Post 1039820)
Brent- What is an IB330 cam?

here is some info

http://www.fordgarage.com/pages/stipecamshaftspecs.htm

BRENT in 10-uh-C 02-24-2015 07:47 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patrick L. (Post 1039816)
I would think terrain comes into play here.

To a certain extent it does, but I live in the mountains of Tennessee, so our terrain is a good representative of how these gears will perform in the mountains.

tbirdtbird 02-24-2015 07:56 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

"What is an IB330 cam?"

it is a thing of beauty. we have installed several of them, including my own car. really wakes the motor up. Stock motor breathes very poorly, and labors going thru the gears. With the IB330 the car just wants to go with hardly any throttle; you can hear and feel that it is not laboring. It is a takeoff on what Ford did for the Model B engine, only better still

BRENT in 10-uh-C 02-25-2015 07:49 AM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by tbirdtbird (Post 1039840)
"What is an IB330 cam?"

it is a thing of beauty. we have installed several of them, including my own car. really wakes the motor up. Stock motor breathes very poorly, and labors going thru the gears. With the IB330 the car just wants to go with hardly any throttle; you can hear and feel that it is not laboring. It is a takeoff on what Ford did for the Model B engine, only better still

Here's a thought, ....what do we do for cams should these ever become unavailable?

tbirdtbird 02-25-2015 12:13 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

Jim Brierley has masters that he has regrinds done from. He just posted some of his specs on a couple cams. We have installed a couple of his cams and they are very nice also!

Dave in Boise 02-26-2015 04:02 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

I would think it depends on terrain as indicated above as well as if you are planning on doing any "Parade Crawls".. You'll wear out your knee constantly taking it in and out of gear in a long parade.. Touring on the flats would be a hoot though ;)

MrBruce 02-26-2015 04:11 PM

Re: 3:27 or 3:54 ??
 

I've been running 3:54's in my 31 S/W Town Sedan with a stock B motor (soon to be built up for touring). We have put thousands of miles on it and it's good for flat roads but not for long hills with the current power situation. Once the new head and downdraft are on, I'm sure it will be much better on the hills. The Tudor is a little lighter than our S/W Town Sedan which should help.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.