Re: 1933 vs 1934 Crossmembers Andy's the man!
|
Re: 1933 vs 1934 Crossmembers 1 Attachment(s)
Sheldon,
The photo below is the best that I could provide. This first version of the '33 front cross member with 12" motor mount insulator spacing is in very poor condition. What makes the photo worthwhile are the two added 'extenders' that permitted the use of the later combined water pump/motor mount brackets with the 17" insulator spacing without having to replace the front cross member. They are real and they are Ford parts illustrated in an early '33 Service Letter. I have one in NOS form. |
Re: 1933 vs 1934 Crossmembers Great.Thanks!!
|
Re: 1933 vs 1934 Crossmembers You're welcome, as always.
|
Re: 1933 vs 1934 Crossmembers Quote:
|
Re: 1933 vs 1934 Crossmembers Pete,
Thanks! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.